Review




Structured Review

Addgene inc mruby2 n1
Mruby2 N1, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 18 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mruby2 n1/product/Addgene inc
Average 93 stars, based on 18 article reviews
mruby2 n1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
93/100 stars

Images



Similar Products

93
Addgene inc mruby2 n1
Mruby2 N1, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mruby2 n1/product/Addgene inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mruby2 n1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Addgene inc mruby2
Comparison of in‐gel fluorescence (IGF) of tagRFP‐T‐, <t>mRuby2‐,</t> mCherry‐, and mKO‐κ‐tagged proteins. (a) Yeast expressing Bmh1‐tagRFP‐T, Bmh1‐mRuby2, Bmh1‐mCherry, or Bmh1‐mKO‐κ were lysed in native conditions, samples were resuspended in LDS sample buffer and incubated for 5 min at the indicated temperatures. After migration on a commercial precast 4%–20%TGX gel (Bio‐Rad), gels were imaged for red fluorescence using a Typhoon or a Chemidoc MP, and total proteins were visualized by the stain‐free technology on a Chemidoc MP. Proteins were then transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane and immunoblotted with anti‐Bmh1 antibodies and then with anti‐rabbit antibodies coupled to HRP, and revealed by chemiluminescence on a Chemidoc MP. * indicates the fluorescent species. (b) Yeast expressing Bmh1‐mCherry were lysed in native conditions, samples were resuspended in LDS sample buffer and incubated for 5 min at the indicated temperatures in a gradient thermocycler. After migration on a commercial precast 4–20% TGX gel (Bio‐Rad), gels were imaged for red fluorescence using a Typhoon, and total proteins were visualized by the stain‐free technology on a Chemidoc. Proteins were then transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane and immunoblotted with anti‐Bmh1 antibodies and then with anti‐rabbit antibodies coupled to HRP, and revealed by chemiluminescence on a Chemidoc MP. (c) Same as (b) on lysates of yeast expressing Bmh1‐mKO‐κ. (d) Quantification of the fluorescence signal as a function of the denaturation temperature for mCherry‐tagged and mKO‐κ‐tagged Bmh1 ( n = 3; ±SD). Solid line: sigmoidal fit of the data (GraphPad Prism), dotted line: 95% confidence interval of the fit. HRP, horseradish peroxidase; LDS, lithium dodecyl sulfate.
Mruby2, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mruby2/product/Addgene inc
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mruby2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Addgene inc plasmid mruby2 n1
Comparison of in‐gel fluorescence (IGF) of tagRFP‐T‐, <t>mRuby2‐,</t> mCherry‐, and mKO‐κ‐tagged proteins. (a) Yeast expressing Bmh1‐tagRFP‐T, Bmh1‐mRuby2, Bmh1‐mCherry, or Bmh1‐mKO‐κ were lysed in native conditions, samples were resuspended in LDS sample buffer and incubated for 5 min at the indicated temperatures. After migration on a commercial precast 4%–20%TGX gel (Bio‐Rad), gels were imaged for red fluorescence using a Typhoon or a Chemidoc MP, and total proteins were visualized by the stain‐free technology on a Chemidoc MP. Proteins were then transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane and immunoblotted with anti‐Bmh1 antibodies and then with anti‐rabbit antibodies coupled to HRP, and revealed by chemiluminescence on a Chemidoc MP. * indicates the fluorescent species. (b) Yeast expressing Bmh1‐mCherry were lysed in native conditions, samples were resuspended in LDS sample buffer and incubated for 5 min at the indicated temperatures in a gradient thermocycler. After migration on a commercial precast 4–20% TGX gel (Bio‐Rad), gels were imaged for red fluorescence using a Typhoon, and total proteins were visualized by the stain‐free technology on a Chemidoc. Proteins were then transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane and immunoblotted with anti‐Bmh1 antibodies and then with anti‐rabbit antibodies coupled to HRP, and revealed by chemiluminescence on a Chemidoc MP. (c) Same as (b) on lysates of yeast expressing Bmh1‐mKO‐κ. (d) Quantification of the fluorescence signal as a function of the denaturation temperature for mCherry‐tagged and mKO‐κ‐tagged Bmh1 ( n = 3; ±SD). Solid line: sigmoidal fit of the data (GraphPad Prism), dotted line: 95% confidence interval of the fit. HRP, horseradish peroxidase; LDS, lithium dodecyl sulfate.
Plasmid Mruby2 N1, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/plasmid mruby2 n1/product/Addgene inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
plasmid mruby2 n1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Comparison of in‐gel fluorescence (IGF) of tagRFP‐T‐, mRuby2‐, mCherry‐, and mKO‐κ‐tagged proteins. (a) Yeast expressing Bmh1‐tagRFP‐T, Bmh1‐mRuby2, Bmh1‐mCherry, or Bmh1‐mKO‐κ were lysed in native conditions, samples were resuspended in LDS sample buffer and incubated for 5 min at the indicated temperatures. After migration on a commercial precast 4%–20%TGX gel (Bio‐Rad), gels were imaged for red fluorescence using a Typhoon or a Chemidoc MP, and total proteins were visualized by the stain‐free technology on a Chemidoc MP. Proteins were then transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane and immunoblotted with anti‐Bmh1 antibodies and then with anti‐rabbit antibodies coupled to HRP, and revealed by chemiluminescence on a Chemidoc MP. * indicates the fluorescent species. (b) Yeast expressing Bmh1‐mCherry were lysed in native conditions, samples were resuspended in LDS sample buffer and incubated for 5 min at the indicated temperatures in a gradient thermocycler. After migration on a commercial precast 4–20% TGX gel (Bio‐Rad), gels were imaged for red fluorescence using a Typhoon, and total proteins were visualized by the stain‐free technology on a Chemidoc. Proteins were then transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane and immunoblotted with anti‐Bmh1 antibodies and then with anti‐rabbit antibodies coupled to HRP, and revealed by chemiluminescence on a Chemidoc MP. (c) Same as (b) on lysates of yeast expressing Bmh1‐mKO‐κ. (d) Quantification of the fluorescence signal as a function of the denaturation temperature for mCherry‐tagged and mKO‐κ‐tagged Bmh1 ( n = 3; ±SD). Solid line: sigmoidal fit of the data (GraphPad Prism), dotted line: 95% confidence interval of the fit. HRP, horseradish peroxidase; LDS, lithium dodecyl sulfate.

Journal: Biology of the Cell

Article Title: Direct observation of fluorescent proteins in gels: A rapid, cost‐efficient, and quantitative alternative to immunoblotting

doi: 10.1111/boc.202400161

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of in‐gel fluorescence (IGF) of tagRFP‐T‐, mRuby2‐, mCherry‐, and mKO‐κ‐tagged proteins. (a) Yeast expressing Bmh1‐tagRFP‐T, Bmh1‐mRuby2, Bmh1‐mCherry, or Bmh1‐mKO‐κ were lysed in native conditions, samples were resuspended in LDS sample buffer and incubated for 5 min at the indicated temperatures. After migration on a commercial precast 4%–20%TGX gel (Bio‐Rad), gels were imaged for red fluorescence using a Typhoon or a Chemidoc MP, and total proteins were visualized by the stain‐free technology on a Chemidoc MP. Proteins were then transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane and immunoblotted with anti‐Bmh1 antibodies and then with anti‐rabbit antibodies coupled to HRP, and revealed by chemiluminescence on a Chemidoc MP. * indicates the fluorescent species. (b) Yeast expressing Bmh1‐mCherry were lysed in native conditions, samples were resuspended in LDS sample buffer and incubated for 5 min at the indicated temperatures in a gradient thermocycler. After migration on a commercial precast 4–20% TGX gel (Bio‐Rad), gels were imaged for red fluorescence using a Typhoon, and total proteins were visualized by the stain‐free technology on a Chemidoc. Proteins were then transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane and immunoblotted with anti‐Bmh1 antibodies and then with anti‐rabbit antibodies coupled to HRP, and revealed by chemiluminescence on a Chemidoc MP. (c) Same as (b) on lysates of yeast expressing Bmh1‐mKO‐κ. (d) Quantification of the fluorescence signal as a function of the denaturation temperature for mCherry‐tagged and mKO‐κ‐tagged Bmh1 ( n = 3; ±SD). Solid line: sigmoidal fit of the data (GraphPad Prism), dotted line: 95% confidence interval of the fit. HRP, horseradish peroxidase; LDS, lithium dodecyl sulfate.

Article Snippet: Tagging with yeast codon‐optimized Tag‐RFP‐T or mRuby2 was achieved using the pFa6‐link‐yoTag‐RFP‐T‐CaURA3 and pFA6a‐link‐yomRuby2‐SpHIS5, respectively (gifts from Kurt Thorn and Wendell Lim, Addgene plasmids #44877 and #44843).

Techniques: Comparison, Fluorescence, Expressing, Incubation, Migration, Staining, Membrane